Healees' reports are a neglected resource
in understanding and appreciating healing. Western medicine tends
to focus on objective, measurable effects of treatments and to discount
qualitative, subjective aspects of responses to therapies. Healing is a wholistic treatment, reaching
all levels of body, emotions, mind, relationships, and spirit. Healees'
reports often reflect these effects - which extend way beyond symptomatic
treatments. However, as with those of healers, anecdotal
reports of healees may be weakened for lack of clarity and specificity
of descriptions. While this is inherently the nature of many effects
of healing, it does make it difficult for anyone who is unfamiliar
with healing to appreciate and accept these reports. Healee reports should include as many as
possible of the facors recommended for the reports of healers. A part of the assessment of a reader regarding
a healee's report will relate to the professionalism with which
it is presented. It is helpful to the skeptic to see that the writer
can distinguish between subjective and objective information, and
can acknowledge the possibility of biases of belief systems that
could shade the report in one way or another. Reports that only
sing the praises of a particular healer or healing method are less
likely to be impressive or convincing to those who are unfamiliar
with healing. Reports that include some of the following factors
may be more helpful: A brief sketch of the
healee, to include any details that would help
a reader to believe the report Clear descriptions of
the problem(s) that were addressed by the
healer Specific medical diagnoses
of the problems How long the problems
were present What conventional treatments
had been applied, by whom, for how long, and with what results Name of the healer, healing
method(s) used, with a brief description
of the method(s) Subjective experiences
during treatment Frequency of treatments Changes in the presenting
problems that resulted following treatments,
with a time course for these changes How long the changes lasted Consideration of any other
factors that might have contributed to
the changes (e.g. changes in stress levels, residual effects of
any previous treatments) Changes that occurred
following healing that were not a part of
the problems for which healing was sought
|